You are here

3.2.2 Automating priorities

Elze07-07-14

	Which priorities are automatically the most important?
1	Do you think that what is most humane righteous should be given the highest priority?	Or	Do you think what's most important should get the greatest priority?
2	Do you think that priorities should be based on a universal basic right of not damaging each other mentally, physically or otherwise?	Or	Do you think that the law of the jungle dictates and that only the most weighty voices count?
3	Do you think that human-righteous priorities and universal right not to damage each other mentally, physically or otherwise even has priority if the majority thinks otherwise?	Or	Do you think that most voices also count the most when a multitude of lightweights produce frivolous signals, stupid motives, nonsensical arguments and frenzied reactions?
4	Do you also choose human-righteous priorities if a large mass forces you, on the basis of democratic principles, to violently submit to the genetic manipulation of superego-centric sapiens atmospheres?	Or	Do you choose aggression for your priorities when a violent group behaves like physically outdated Überego's and you others dictate not to signal unpleasantness or ciriticize them with logical arguments but - according to 'my'[read their] opinion - like a genetic airhead has to bend for a super-egocentric sapiens-atmo-sphere?

5	Do you make your priorities at all times subordinate to what is humane, reasonable and righteous for you and others, regardless of the number of people who think otherwise?	Or	Do you think that the priorities of the 'weighty' should be given priority; even if they turn out to be a violent and/or super frivolous boasting mass of egotists with an ostrich policy that is not only harmful, but also destructive to your priorities and those of others?
6	Do you think that many small humane-righteous priorities can be made to work together in such a structured way that, internally and extrinsically, they together lead to one humane-righteous personality that can withstand unreasonable priorities?	Or	Do you think that you can combine many small egotistical priorities in such a structured way that they form in and extrinsically a [multiple] egotistical personality group that both silences all critics as damages all eliminates and destroys all competition?
7	Do you think that a humane righteous personality with humane righteous priorities can provide a sufficient humane righteous counterbalance to a violent split egoist and group?	Or	Do you think that a violent split egoist-and-group can put such a superego-centric bodyweight on the public scale that all humane righteous priorities will soon be defeated and only privatised egoists who inhumanely take the right in a collective dictatorial hand will remain?
8	Do you think that a violent split egoist-and-group over time, based on selfish considerations, will choose righteousness for its money and respond to humane-righteous priorities?	Or	Do you think that the selfish priorities of a violently split egoist-and-group at all times and at all costs, will remain subordinate to the super-egocentric privatized airheads of the Public Entity?

9	Are you in heart and soul a humane-righteous personality who subordinates own and other priorities to not damaging yourself and others?	Or	Are you an air-headed privatized egoist-and-group with a violent [in Dutch + dad] split heavyweight as Public Body?
l0	Do you think that you will at all times subordinate your priorities to the universal right to not harm each other, mentally, physically or otherwise?	Or	Do you think you will subordinate your [weighty] priorities to the boasting priorities of the superegocentric privatized airheads of the Public Entity?
11	Do you think humane-righteous arguments should have the highest word?	Or	Do you think the egoistic airheads of the Public Entity will have the highest word?
12	Is there already a humane-righteous alarm bell ringing with you?	Or	Is there such an superego-centric megaphone that you can't hear a thing?

13	Is the content of human-righteous arguments above the individual?	Or	Is the biggist screamer always right?
14	Are both good arguing and badly arguing individuals subordinate to human-righteous priorities?	Or	Do yout think that the mass of voiceless individuals are subordinate to the egoistic arguments of megaphonic voice raisers?
15	Do you think about humane righteous conditions and arguments before you automate your priorities?	Or	Do you automatically copy the weighty talk and trade of a superego-centric group megaphonic air-heads?
16	Did you score all or most of the confirmations on the left? If so, keep it up, you're on the right track, because many small humane-righteous priorities make one human-righteous self-manager and the beginning of a human-righteous society.	Or	Did you score all or most confirmations on the right? If so, go back to the beginning and start practicing self-management again, because you are on the egotistically grouped way; you think to be social by doing what you have heard yourself and/or other egoists shouting, but have no idea how to connect righteous conditions to it.

By reflecting daily on the conditions under which you automate your priorities, you can adjust your priorities according to your needs in such a way that you prevent, reduce or minimize damage to yourself and others and realise humane righteous improvements.

← →